Oh!  ...Recommend you click your browser refresh, each time you visit, to see the latest additions (which I think is true for all the websites).

Text size (should be) enlargeable by holding down CTRL
  and turning the mouse wheel.

How easy.  Who knew?  Thank you, again, Judi. 
(Her beautiful webpages are temporarily down.)

Yet to finish descendant charts, which were almost ready and up for a short time (and cached already by Google), when I was side-tracked by all this Sos (Spelling of surname) curiosity.  Oh well.  Finishing, number 8 (Legacies) will now be off into the distant future.

If 69,000 back in the mid-1960’s,
then how many descendants of George W. Britain now?  
 
Cousin Irene Britain Peddicord made note of approximately 69,000 descendants of one child of John and Catharine Hensley Britten, in her (famous within the family) "Peddicord Letters."  She also mentioned they may have had as many as eleven children. 11 x 69,000 = y. Since I was a child in the early 60’s when this calculation was just in the ten-thousands and there are now 2 more generations in those genie tree branches, with 5 more people each, then 11 x 69,000 = y x 5. Five people in the next two generation should about balance the maximum number of eleven children early on. I think.

A little html for genealogy websites humor 
I'm having trouble with my ‘relative hyperlinks...’
  The ‘absolute links’ are too long to type out each time."
  [Relative gen*Hyperlinks ©2007 B.GaiL]

BRicTioN 
There is a website that has a Great Grandfather married to his mother, and without a way to contact anyone about the mistake.  Just be aware this is not a Sos (Spelling of surname) problem, but rather one of something-else.